We put artificial intelligence
to work inside your company,
from decision to execution
Four offers that answer one another: generative decision intelligence, business AI agents, on-premise LLM models, training and awareness. One requirement runs through all of them — your data stays with you.
The data is there, the decisions wait
In most of the organisations we meet, the information is already there: ERP, SQL Server, PostgreSQL or MySQL databases, spreadsheets, business applications. What is missing is the short path between a management question and a reliable answer.
There is a great deal of talk about artificial intelligence, and very little industrialisation. Consumer tools have shown what is possible; what survives in production rests on other foundations: scoped data, explicit entitlements, written usage rules and trained teams.
Five offers, one single route
They follow one another rather than sitting side by side: make the data queryable, automate what deserves it, decide where the models run, train the teams, then frame usage through governance that actually applies.
Generative decision intelligence
Ask your question in French or English and get an answer built from your own databases. Entitlements respected, queries logged, no impact on production.
Business AI agents
An agent receives an objective and carries out the sequence of actions it requires in your applications: search, check, enter, notify. It works under explicit permissions, with human validation for sensitive actions.
On-premise LLM models
Open models running on your own infrastructure: confidentiality, sovereignty, predictable costs and independence from API providers. An internal gateway filters, logs and caps usage.
Training and awareness
Four tracks — executives, business staff, IT and data teams, awareness workshops — built on your real cases. No tool is of any use if it is neither understood nor used.
AI audit and governance
An inventory of what actually circulates in the company, a written usage policy, an entitlement matrix, continuous controls. A framework that can be enforced, not a decorative charter.
An assistant answers. An agent executes.
The difference is not technological, it is operational: an agent acts inside your systems, touches data and changes records. That is why it requires a stricter framework than a conversational assistant.
An assistant answers
You have to ask it the question, at the right moment, with the right words. It produces an answer: you check it, you carry it into the application, you type in the result. The value is real, but it depends on the user being available and paying attention.
An agent executes
It receives an objective, breaks the task down, calls the tools it is allowed to use, checks what comes back, tries again if needed, then reports what it did. You remain the judge of the outcome, but you are no longer the operator.
Seven business areas concerned
CRM and sales
Meeting preparation from the customer history, opportunity updates, follow-up on quotes left pending, account summaries.
Accounting and finance
Statement reconciliation, detection of missing supporting documents, preparation of statements, payment deadline tracking.
Human resources
Shortlisting applications against explicit criteria under supervision, interview preparation, leave and training tracking.
Production
Work order tracking, reporting of consumption variances, downtime entry, preparation of production reviews.
Logistics and procurement
Order and delivery tracking, comparison of supplier offers, stock-out alerts, import file preparation.
Customer service
Answers to recurring questions from approved documentation, ticket creation and follow-up, documented escalation to a responsible person.
Management reporting
Consolidation of key indicators, explanation of variances, a summary note built on identified and dated sources.
Three non-negotiable conditions
Explicit permissions
Every agent has an identity, a data perimeter, a list of tools and written limits on what it may do. It does neither more nor less than what is defined.
Complete logging
Every tool call is traced: who, what, when, on which data and with which result. What is not traced cannot be run in production.
Human validation
Sensitive actions — payment, commitment, sending to a third party — still require a person's approval. Without exception, even when the agent is right.
Your models, your infrastructure, your data
Hosting the model instead of consuming an API changes three things: what may leave the company, the shape of the cost, and who decides on changes.
Confidentiality
The requests and documents being processed never leave your infrastructure. That point alone often decides the matter.
Sovereignty
You know where the data is, who can reach it and under which jurisdiction it is processed — and you can demonstrate it.
Predictable costs
An amortised infrastructure investment rather than a variable expense that follows usage and someone else's price list.
Independence
Changing model becomes an internal technical decision again: you are no longer bound to a third party's commercial policy.
Four tracks, four audiences
Executives, business staff, IT and data teams, awareness workshops: every session starts from your real cases and ends with an action plan.
Executives — understand and decide
What these systems can do today, what they cannot do, and what that changes for your organisation, your data and your business lines. How to judge an investment and set the framework for use.
Business staff — use it day to day
Framing a useful request, checking an answer, spotting a plausible mistake, documenting what was done. Exercises on your documents, your indicators and your procedures.
IT and data teams — run, administer, secure
Deploying and monitoring a platform or an on-site model, managing entitlements, reading the logs, measuring quality, responding to an incident. Hands-on work on your own environment.
Awareness workshops — open the subject
A session designed for one department or one management team: demonstrations on your processes, a collective mapping of the tasks to automate and those to protect, answers to legitimate concerns.
Query your databases in plain language
SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL: your teams ask their question in their own words and get an answer built on your data, within the access rules in force. Every answer leaves a trail — question asked, query executed, data consulted — and no process writes to production systems.
- Your existing entitlements apply: nobody sees beyond their own rights.
- Every answer is auditable end to end, down to the query actually executed.
- Read-only access, execution limits and timeouts: production is never touched.
| Tier | Scope | Duration | Indicative investment |
|---|---|---|---|
| P0 Diagnostic | Framing, data audit, prioritised use cases, target architecture | 4–6 weeks | XAF 9–15 m |
| P1 Benchmark & POC | Technology comparison on your real data, measured POC | 8–10 weeks | XAF 25–45 m |
| P2 Pilot platform | Semantics, business agents, 20–50 pilot users | 10–14 weeks | XAF 60–120 m |
| P3 Industrialisation | Security, monitoring, backup, training, go-live | 12–20 weeks | XAF 90–250 m |
| RUN Operations | N2/N3 support, maintenance, cost supervision, new indicators | 12 months minimum | from XAF 2.5 m/month |
Indicative ranges, excluding taxes, confirmed by quotation after framing. Every tier ends with a decision: continue, adjust or stop.
Eight industries, eight different contexts
We do not sell the same demonstration to everyone. Each industry has its own page: issues, use cases, typical pilot scope, governance and indicators tracked.
Banking & finance
Sector issues, use cases, typical pilot scope and indicators tracked.
Energy & utilities
Sector issues, use cases, typical pilot scope and indicators tracked.
Logistics & ports
Sector issues, use cases, typical pilot scope and indicators tracked.
Industry & agribusiness
Sector issues, use cases, typical pilot scope and indicators tracked.
Three stages, no shortcuts
Start from a use case
A precise process, a named owner, an expected value written down before any technology choice.
Measure what the data allows
Quality, availability, access rights: the proof is made on your data and your questions, not on a demonstration.
Industrialise what holds
What survived the tests goes into production with monitoring, documentation and skills transfer. The rest stops.
What we build, and why
Vision
Strategic foresight: to become the engine of technological sovereignty and of the 4th Industrial Revolution, and to build an ecosystem where advanced engineering serves the structural development and autonomy of strategic national and regional sectors.
Mission
Full digitalisation: to support the deep transformation of organisations (logistics, maritime, finance, health) through the design of robust architectures, and to guide every client from feasibility study to the deployment of tailored solutions.
Four values
Systems thinking
Rigorous engineering, precise process mapping and explicit architecture modelling.
Technological independence
Infrastructures you control: dedicated servers, sovereign cloud.
Security & sovereignty
Cyber resilience and absolute protection of data at the heart of every solution.
Open source & efficiency
World-class community solutions: ERP, financial systems.
TAMPOLLA Serge Destin
A systems engineer and architect — AI and Big Data — he commits the firm to its projects and to the technical promises it makes.
Systems engineer and architect — AI and Big Data
of experience in information systems architecture and engineering, put to work on your use cases.
Skills
- Software architecture and engineering
- Cybersecurity
- Project management
- IT strategy and governance
- Competitive intelligence
- Strategic management
Certifications
- Certified Blockchain Developer
- Certified Kubernetes Administrator
- Data Science Analysis
- DevOps CI/CD
The ADVISORE presentation
Nine pages introducing the firm: our vision and values, our services, the technologies we put to work, the industries we serve and the founder. A useful agenda for a first conversation, and meant to circulate inside your organisation.
Four reasons to entrust us with the subject
Multidisciplinary expertise
Data, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, architecture, project management and governance: an AI project is treated as a system, not as an isolated piece of software.
A tailored approach
No standardised demonstration: the scope is built from your use cases, your constraints and the skills you already have.
Technological sovereignty
Open source and infrastructures you control: your data stays under your control and your technology choices remain your own.
End-to-end support
From feasibility study to production, with monitoring, documentation and skills transfer included: your teams administer the platform at the end of the engagement.
Describe your context, we answer plainly
One conversation is enough to know whether the subject deserves a project, and where to start.
Prefer a more precise starting point? Begin with the diagnostic for your industry: a few questions, and a first reading of what is at stake.